Sunday, March 11, 2012

Evil...Really??

What do we really know about Esav? Not a lot thats for sure. We have come accustomed to calling him red, but that is about it. Yes it also says that he was a man of the fields, but really thats it. Us ourselves make him out to be someone evil. As Purim has just passed, there is a character in that story that we also don't know very much about, Vashti. We make her out to be this very evil, ugly, bad person. In reality though that is just how me made her up to be. In actuality the megilah does not say much about her at all. I guess we just assumed her to be a bad person because she rejected the king. Was that so evil of her? If we think about it, if she didn't refuse the king's invitation, Achashverosh would have never had to look for a new queen and Esther would have never come into the picture. Ok maybe she would have because Mordechi still would not have bowed down to Haman, but let's face it the whole story would have been completely different. I'm sure that Esther would not have had it so easy if she hadn't been made the queen.
In my opinion and if I'm not mistaken Rabbi Perl also thought so, that Vashti is really a hero. Maybe not a hero, but definitely not a bad or evil person. If it wasn't for her refusing to join the king at his party who knows what would have happend to the Jewish people. At the time, I'm sure Vashti seemed bad, but in the long run what she did was great for us!
I think its the same with Esav. He might not have been as evil as we thought him out to be. It's not like the Torah told us explicitly that he was an evil person. He hunted, so what? He could have been getting meat to eat. Without Esav giving over the bechorah our fate could have been completely different. Again who knows where we would be right now if he had kept it. I think in this sense Esav is a hero almost. He gave over the bechorah without a fight even. Yes, most people think he was crazy and just for giving it up he was a bad person. If he hadn't given it up, we might all be the complete opposite religion wise right now. Ok, so maybe I wouldn't call him a "hero", but I definitely would not call him evil. And let's be honest, we have all had those times where we thought we were going to die from hunger or exhaustion. Like the Sforno Racheli and I had to learn said, he said he was going to die because he was so tired, but honestly we have all most probably been there. We all over exaggerate sometimes, but that is not a crime.
So basically I do not think Esav is such a bad person. We might make him out to be and everyone thinks he is but in reality no where does it say that for sure. All we know about him is that he was red because he was covered in a red coat of hair and that he was a man of the field. There is nothing in that information to indicate that he was evil or even remotely bad. With Vashti also. She was just judged by how we perceived her, but really its all made up.
Thanks Rabbi Perl for giving me the perfect blog post at your house on Purim!!

4 comments:

  1. I agree with you that Esav may not have have been an evil person and that we don't have enough textual evidence to conclude whether or not he was. We DO know however, that Esav did do things that he was not supposed to do such as his marriage to a girl from Cnaan. Basically, whther or not he was evil, we can still say he was only human and no one is perfect.

    ReplyDelete
  2. On a separate note from my last comment, we do know that Vashti was not good, whether or not we can get incriminating evidence from the text of the megilah. We don't know whether or not she was evil (some commentators seem to follow that understanding of the text), but we do know she did bad things and had bad qualities. Also, even though things might have been different if Vashti had conceded to the king's demand, we know that everything happens for a reason and if Vashti had not been killed for refusing to come to the feast, something else would have happened to put Esther in the position she needed to be put in so she could do what she needed to do.

    ReplyDelete
  3. IN response to Mirel's ideas, VAshti and Eisav both had bad qualities, but on the other hand, they both had good qualities as well. Why, according to most people, did Vashti refuse to come before the king? He wanted to show her off to his guests, most probably unclothed. She was preserving her dignity and, in fact, the dignity of all women of her time, by refusing. Eisav was excellent at kibud av. He honored his father(we aren't sure about his mother) as well as he was able to. So, perhaps this can go to show us that no one is completely "bad", and that everyone has something they can contribute.

    ReplyDelete
  4. IN response to Mirel's ideas, VAshti and Eisav both had bad qualities, but on the other hand, they both had good qualities as well. Why, according to most people, did Vashti refuse to come before the king? He wanted to show her off to his guests, most probably unclothed. She was preserving her dignity and, in fact, the dignity of all women of her time, by refusing. Eisav was excellent at kibud av. He honored his father(we aren't sure about his mother) as well as he was able to. So, perhaps this can go to show us that no one is completely "bad", and that everyone has something they can contribute.

    ReplyDelete