Sunday, October 9, 2011
Adam vs. Kayin
I'd like to compare Adam's sin and punishment to Kayin's. Adam violates the first ever commandment by G-d when he eats from the Tree of Knowledge. His punishment is that he will be banished from Gan Eden, his home and will have to toil to make the found produce crops. Later, his son, Kayin becomes jealous of his brother Havel. G-d had accepted Havel's offerings and had not accepted Kayin's. While working in the field one day Kayin murders Havel. His punishment is that he is cursed and is banished from the land and will be a nomad for the remainder of his life. But, Hashem will protect him from being murdered by the people. To me, this whole situation is confusing. Adam was the first ever person. He was like a baby. He was still learning right from wrong and was very naive. Kayin, on the hand had more experience than Adam, and had the chance to learn from Adam's mistakes. Yet, he receives divine protection after his sin. One could argue that this is because in Adam's time there wasn't anyone to be protected against, since he and Chava were the only two people on Earth. Also, Adam violated a direct violation from G-d, and Kayin did not. Both were asked questions by G-d, giving them a chance to own up to what they did, and do Teshuva. Neither did Teshuva. Adam blamed his wife, and Kayin pretended to be innocent. To me, it would make sense to let the people kill Kayin and not give him any divine protection. After all, he did commit murder. From the concept of מדה כנגד מדה, Kayin should be murdered. The man he killed was G-d fearing and G-d must have liked him if he had accepted his offerings. Here is my personal explanation for this: After Adam sinned, G-d saw that man is drawn to sin. It takes a lot of effort to prevent them self from committing a sin. Perhaps G-d thought that just because Adam sinned doesn't mean every human from then on will too. Then came Kayin and Havel. Havel showed great potential and feared G-d. Kayin was not like his brother, and his offerings were not accepted, causing him to eventually kill his brother out of jealousy. G-d saw that man had become corrupt. Without divine guidance and protection they would never learn and life on Earth would be a disaster. If G0d just sent Kayin off into the world and he was killed, the cycle would begin again. Sin, punishment, exile, death, corruption and so on. G-d had to protect Kayin so he could help the human race and hopefully prevent any further corruption.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
To add to what Alyssa said:
ReplyDeleteI think there was a purpose to the punishments that Hashem gave Adam and Kayin. I think of sin and evil as if they were "Pandora's Box". I have considered that if Adam and Kayin had not been the ones to release evil into the world, someone else would have. Adam was the first being to be created "בצלם אלקים", and Hashem had to go through several batches of humans before settling on the "recipe" of Noach's descendants. Also, if Hashem had killed Kayin for his sin and punished Adam more severely, people would not want to believe in Hashem. They could very easily pray to their idols and pretend that their lives were fine. Hashem's restraint here shows us that there is always a chance for us to repent. Although neither of these men did repent, we need to understand that if we sin, we ALWAYS have a chance to redeem ourselves.
What Alyssa and Sarah said makes sense, but I also want to point something else out.
ReplyDelete"To me, it would make sense to let the people kill Kayin and not give him any divine protection. After all, he did commit murder. From the concept of מדה כנגד מדה, Kayin should be murdered."
It's a logical punishment for if someone commits murder to kill them, but as we see both in the תורה and in the secular world today, there are very few occasions in which someone is actually killed for committing murder. There are so many conditions to take into account. Did the person know what he was doing? Did he know it was wrong? Did he even do it on purpose? Was he just insane? Was it premeditated? In today's world, what degree murder was it? In the תורה, was he warned by 2 people and then went ahead and did it anyway after acknowledging the warning? There are so many things to take into account when deciding how a person is to be punished. Also, who are we to take a person's life? We are only humans, created by 'ה, just like the person we are about to put to death.
In response to Mirel: I understand what you're saying, but obviously there are diiferent circumstances now than there were back in the times of Adam and Chava. I was saying that since Adam's punishment was according to the concept of מדה כנגד מדה, shouldn't Kayin's be to?
ReplyDeleteMaybe he wouldn't have been killed by the people, but if he was then it shouldn't have been such a tragedy (because of what he did to Havel).
If you think about it though if Kayin was killed then a new nation could have begun there. Kayin wouldn't have kids and his kids would never know he did something wrong. As we see the bad ones are descendants from bad ones so maybe if Kayin was killed their would have been less bad people to turn away from Hashem, because the starter of the bad would be dead.
ReplyDelete